Australia - The Land Down Under



late 90's i think, cant remember who the artist was

Little Plastic Castle by Ani DiFranco. She's only got a few songs, that I know of, that I actually enjoy.

Anyhow, I do wonder how many other countries will enact similar regulations. From a technical standpoint, this seems difficult to actually enforce.
 
I do wonder how many other countries will enact similar regulations
as you know, the UK started it this year, causing Imgur to block the UK , but you can use Anonsurf/Tor or a VPN to get round it [but I find it a pain in the butt as speeds are adversely affected]
 
Reddit is the only social media to send me details, thus far.

The only other I belong to is faceache ..er...facebook. No word from them.

Imgur blocking the UK, sounds reasonable, given the circumstances.

It occurs to me that the 'ban' on kids activities is nothing more than an attempt to 'tidy up' the horrendous nature of the activities visited upon them by some/all of the 'social' media apps.....which the various apps simply refused to tidy up themselves when asked.

Imgur is not included in the Australian ban

A problem created by adults. It would make a great deal of ?sense/ ?....to burn the whole mess to the ground and start again.


 

'I'd like it in this country': Our readers have their say on Australia's social media ban published at 10:32 on December 10th, 2025​



We've been asking readers to share their views on Australia's teen social media ban.

Here's what some of you have said:

Companies like Facebook have been profiting off all the issues social media cause children. This is why apps like Retro Photos or Favs Private Social Network are so popular in the US. You should be featuring these to give them highlights. - Saba in Los Angeles, California

I know it's tough love, and there's going to be tears, wailing and gnashing of teeth. BUT. Sometimes children need to be told they can't have stuff. - Tony, 64,Chesterfield, England

We are ALL affected by the social media ban in Australia. I agree with the teens that the law should be used to remove harmful content, forcing social media companies and search engines to police the internet removing harmful content and prosecuting those posting. - Mike in Chelmsford, England

I have a child who isn't subject to this very sensible law, I'd like it in this country. The evidence is that social media is a psychoactive 'drug' that increases anxiety and dependence.and of course the 15-year-olds are supported by a group who fund them, it's in Meta's interests to back them all the way. Your own journalism has reported on this corrupt and dangerous commercial enterprise. It's a new opium war but on our kids. - Gareth in Cambridge, England
 
Last edited:

Ban 'hit harder than I expected', says Sydney teen published at 09:38​

09:38, 10th December 2025​

f3964512-a0b8-4195-859a-4953d03d1d96.jpg.webp
Amy, Year 8 student
Reporting from Sydney


It was 20:50 on Tuesday night (09:50 GMT) when I took a break from studying and tried to check Snapchat.

I knew the ban was coming, but it hit harder than I expected.

When Snapchat asked me to verify my age, I had to choose between bypassing it or staying honest, and, desperate to retrieve years of photo "memories", I asked my 17-year-old sister to do the face verification.

I didn’t fully realise what the ban would mean until last night. I was overwhelmed with panic, knowing I’d lose access to basically all of my most-used apps.

No more funny snaps with friends. No more Instagram reels from my mum. No more baking ideas, workout routines, or study motivation.

But then it hit me, probably the hardest, that YouTube and TikTok - both pillars in my life that I have grown up with, the place I go to for everything from maths explanations to grwm [get ready with me] vlogs - were also going to disappear.

I understand why the ban exists - social media can negatively affect mental health, and for some people, the algorithms take over their lives. The ban means young people will be pushed to interact with each other in deeper, more meaningful ways.

Although I agree with this, at this moment, it feels like I’m losing more than I’m gaining. Even if I could bypass the Snapchat ban with my sister’s face, there’s no point if my friends can’t.
 
Last edited:

'It should be a personal decision': what Australian teens think of the banpublished at 10:12
10:12​



We talked to teens across Australia to get their views on the ban - and they had a wide range of opinions.

"My mum explained to me that social media is like junk food for the brain," 12-year-old Lola said.

Oliver, who is 14, told us he'd "quickly get over it", while 15-year-old Serena argued social media use should be a personal decision.

"They should be regulating the content not the people viewing the content," says Tyson,15.

@Condobloke wrote: Tyson makes a strong, mature point.^^^^^ .. KIds are kids, they simply want to have what they see as having fun, which 99% of the time will include interacting with their mates. Not so very much different to the bunch of adults who inhabit this forum on a daily basis.
 
Logic tells us that those responsible for enacting legislation to bring this ban into being, will not back down.

Doing so would take away the very thing they seek.

$
 
I understand why the ban exists - social media can negatively affect mental health, and for some people, the algorithms take over their lives. The ban means young people will be pushed to interact with each other in deeper, more meaningful ways.

Although I agree with this, at this moment, it feels like I’m losing more than I’m gaining. Even if I could bypass the Snapchat ban with my sister’s face, there’s no point if my friends can’t.
Withdrawal symptoms.

 
If anybody has a penchant to open/make a social media app, NOW is the time.

There is an opportunity here that may never repeat itself

Read and digest the comments from the affected parties, from the last week or so and from the coming couple of weeks, and form your blueprint based on those comments.

The vast majority of Australian kids do not condone or want material included in their socials, that does harm to their mates/friends. Those that do want this sort of material, are very much the minority. Commonly referred to as being ****holes by the kids themselves.

Our kids have bigger and better brains than we give them credit for.

One of the outstanding problems (in all countries) is that journalists will usually pursue the sort of news that is of a 'sensational' nature, and inevitably comes from those on the fringe, not the mainstream.
 
Australian Bushfire (not ai)

1765326883250.png
 
Australian Bushfire (not ai)

View attachment 29146

it sure makes a difference what kinds of trees there are in the forest. I grew up in western Montana, I'm quite familiar with forest fires - but our trees were mostly pine and pine trees shed their needles to make the ground (and the other plants the compete for light) more flammable. forest fires are entirely normal/natural so many species have evolved to "use" fire. the pine tree is flame resistant - oh, it'll still burn and rather well at that, but it will survive a creeping fire but the ground/competing plant species wont.

I imagine it's quite different when the tree itself is flammable and also exudes oil. presumably that's a survival mechanism, similar to some conifers that require a high-heat fire to open the cones that contain their seeds.
 
the tree is of course flammable and so is the oil......the tops of trees explode in the fire and this, along with branches and leaves and bark cause the fire to move at a frightening pace...up to 30 km/hour in extreme cases.

Fires also burn faster uphill than downhill....the flames preheat the fuel in front of them, so they also gain speed as they go.
The majority of forests in Australia to catch fire are eucalypts....and there are a vast range of different eucalyptus.

Watching a fire making its way up a valley or slope is not for the faint hearted.

The radiant heat created is probably more dangerous than direct flame contact
 
And after the fires have passed....sometimes many weeks /months after........

1765354644238.png

Life begins again.
 
the tree is of course flammable and so is the oil......the tops of trees explode in the fire and this, along with branches and leaves and bark cause the fire to move at a frightening pace...up to 30 km/hour in extreme cases.

Fires also burn faster uphill than downhill....the flames preheat the fuel in front of them, so they also gain speed as they go.
The majority of forests in Australia to catch fire are eucalypts....and there are a vast range of different eucalyptus.

Watching a fire making its way up a valley or slope is not for the faint hearted.

The radiant heat created is probably more dangerous than direct flame contact
I know it may seem a bit morbid, but I just made that photo into a wallpaper.
 


Follow Linux.org

Members online


Top