Thoughts and observations from a new user of Linux (just loaded up Unbuntu Cinnamon on a Dell Latitude). I have been a Windows users since inception (started with DOS using a 5 1/4" floppy in an IBM PC). I finally made the switch to avoid Windows 11. But, if my experience is like others, Linux will never attract Windows users because of one major issue - loading new programs.
Every new Linux user will need to load up a program or two to keep familiarity or to run specific tasks. But telling a new Linux user to "Just enter a few lines of code into the terminal. No big deal." is missing the elephant in the room. Windows users know that all they need to do is click on 'Install" and the operating system does the rest. Not so with Linux.
I just installed the Tor browser. And it was a frustrating challenge. After three different websites, each telling me different lines to run in the terminal or not explaining how to do what they said to do, I finally succeeded by trial and error (none of the three sites gave correct info for my install - I had to make it up by trying different lines of code over and over). Any Windows user who gets past the operating system installation (which is another story), they will shut down from frustration and return to Windows. Windows users (who are 99% of new users) expect to just "Install'" a program - like they are used to.
I often see "There are lots of programs that come with your Linux install that replace and work just as well as those on Windows." True, but that belies the issue. Most users will have a legacy program or two or three they can't live without. We need installing these programs to be a piece of cake. We (yes, I am including myself since I so want Linux to win and bury Microsoft) can't expect users to be here just because of desire. We have to be one step easier, one step better and stand above that competition.
I am not being critical of Linux in general. I have been a major critic of Windows ever since I watched them hold back development to just keep barely one step ahead of the Mac OS to keep market share and they intentionally wiped out my favorite word processor (WordPerfect) and they shut down new or competitive tech and they, . . well, the list is endless.
I actually tried to switch to Linux back in the 2018/2019 era. One of the many "Year of Linux" time frames. I had to abandon it back then because a major program I used was not ported over. Thus, my expectations were high this time, since I had faced a lot of hurdles back then. And this time. Well, the same hurdles are still there. Loading new programs is just not ready for prime time.
Until this can happen, Linux will remain a side note to the behemoth. I know Linux is mostly volunteer driven. But if the enthusiasm is there, why can't we figure out how to achieve a simple "Install" for new software. All the other parts are in place - great interface, ease of use (once running), speed, compatibility and on. But don't expect the big transition to Linux if there is no easy way to install new programs. And, for hecks sake, can't we get all these web sites, who enthusiastically want to tell you how to load a program, to all say the same thing and say in correctly?!
OK, rant over.
Every new Linux user will need to load up a program or two to keep familiarity or to run specific tasks. But telling a new Linux user to "Just enter a few lines of code into the terminal. No big deal." is missing the elephant in the room. Windows users know that all they need to do is click on 'Install" and the operating system does the rest. Not so with Linux.
I just installed the Tor browser. And it was a frustrating challenge. After three different websites, each telling me different lines to run in the terminal or not explaining how to do what they said to do, I finally succeeded by trial and error (none of the three sites gave correct info for my install - I had to make it up by trying different lines of code over and over). Any Windows user who gets past the operating system installation (which is another story), they will shut down from frustration and return to Windows. Windows users (who are 99% of new users) expect to just "Install'" a program - like they are used to.
I often see "There are lots of programs that come with your Linux install that replace and work just as well as those on Windows." True, but that belies the issue. Most users will have a legacy program or two or three they can't live without. We need installing these programs to be a piece of cake. We (yes, I am including myself since I so want Linux to win and bury Microsoft) can't expect users to be here just because of desire. We have to be one step easier, one step better and stand above that competition.
I am not being critical of Linux in general. I have been a major critic of Windows ever since I watched them hold back development to just keep barely one step ahead of the Mac OS to keep market share and they intentionally wiped out my favorite word processor (WordPerfect) and they shut down new or competitive tech and they, . . well, the list is endless.
I actually tried to switch to Linux back in the 2018/2019 era. One of the many "Year of Linux" time frames. I had to abandon it back then because a major program I used was not ported over. Thus, my expectations were high this time, since I had faced a lot of hurdles back then. And this time. Well, the same hurdles are still there. Loading new programs is just not ready for prime time.
Until this can happen, Linux will remain a side note to the behemoth. I know Linux is mostly volunteer driven. But if the enthusiasm is there, why can't we figure out how to achieve a simple "Install" for new software. All the other parts are in place - great interface, ease of use (once running), speed, compatibility and on. But don't expect the big transition to Linux if there is no easy way to install new programs. And, for hecks sake, can't we get all these web sites, who enthusiastically want to tell you how to load a program, to all say the same thing and say in correctly?!
OK, rant over.

