I'm not sure why you gave my last post anyou prefer debian and that is fine if you like slow moving patches and distros. The patches and updates do not change the learning curve at all so your claim does not hold here. never have I seen an update change how I write scripts, while I am sure it happens it is rare. Nothing you know really changes except maybe something obsoleted.

Maybe my wording wasn't clear? I can be verbose at (most) times so if you misunderstood my post, sorry. But I do I suggest you re-read it because I wasn't criticizing anyone or anything.
Your signature reads:
So I'm sure when you re-read my post, you'll notice I wasn't trying to come off as critical. In fact I mainly praised Fedora. I just explained that there was a difference between Debian and Fedora, since saying "same thing can be said of Fedora..." without any context is misleading. I've already listed the differences so let's not rehash that.Remember that linux is a community. As such we should stick together against commercialism and windows, even if we do not agree on which flavor of linux we can support each other.
On the subject of my "claim", I have to point out the strawman here: Where in my last post did I say patches or updates affect the learning curve? Answer: Nowhere.
I did make a valid point about new technologies impeding an everyday newcomer because they learn how to use something, then it changes.
Rapid release cycles kinda force that change on users while LTS gives them a chance to finish getting comfy and understand how the current technologies work so they can apply that understanding to experimenting with the new technologies (safely in a VM) while they wait until their LTS expires. That makes transition smooth and it means from there, they can start looking at whatever distros they like.
And when I referenced scripting, I meant changes in to distro in the next major release. Version X could have complete or partial makeover from Version Y. Think about the role of your wrapper scripts, all the gazillion of your launcher scripts, your post-install config scripts, your intermediary scripts, etc. that rely on certain software/commands, or even a "way of doing things". Changes happen between major versions/releses, and sometimes they mess up your customizations and break your scripts. But those are new releases which I referred to, not updates/patches which I did not refer to. And the thing I was pointing out was that LTS distros provide the comfort for you to slowly migrate while still receiving security patches and critical updates.
Anyway, I hope I cleared things up, despite all the exposition. TL;DR I wasn't bashing Fedora and I wasn't bashing you, I was pointing out factual differences between two distros to avoid confusion. I added an addendum just explaining why I made my recommendation. That's it. We don't have to agree, just don't take what I say out of context or misunderstand my intentions and see them as anything they're not. So, with all explained, I hope we're cool and can avoid threadjacking.