D
Deleted member 161260
Guest
a
Last edited by a moderator:
Under the hood, most distributions run in a similar fashion, the difference between them are the pre-installed packages/apps, the other difference is the hood or desktop environment, with more people wanting to change from windows, the newer desktops are becoming a bit blingy and tend to look a little more like windows, but behind them is usually something like XFCE or Mate, or other well established Linux desktop managers,, if you want a different look you have around 20-30 different desktop builds to choose from traditional basic/functional Linux look, to hashmac [apple look alike] and the newer windows looking.Ubuntu is more and more becoming like windows.
If you are going to rant at least take the time to explain and argue why you see it that way because a topic of three words doesn't add anything useful to the forums or give the room for discussion.Ubuntu is useless.
Don't forget there is Window managers too, which you can customize even more if you want to but it's time taking sometimes.Under the hood, most distributions run in a similar fashion, the difference between them are the pre-installed packages/apps, the other difference is the hood or desktop environment, with more people wanting to change from windows, the newer desktops are becoming a bit blingy and tend to look a little more like windows, but behind them is usually something like XFCE or Mate, or other well established Linux desktop managers,, if you want a different look you have around 20-30 different desktop builds to choose from traditional basic/functional Linux look, to hashmac [apple look alike] and the newer windows looking.
Erm.....in what way? Care to elaborate? What were you expecting to find?Ubuntu is useless.
Not quite. Not yet.Ubuntu becoming like Windows
That guy complain for 3 seconds delay on launching and app, it's irritating how spoiled people can be
Fixed it for you.Ubuntu Studio is useless.
You could say that he got spoiled by most distros functioning properly.That guy complain for 3 seconds delay on launching and app, it's irritating how spoiled people can be
I think the problem with snaps is that they doesn't follow the Open-Source Narrative, considering that most Linux users are free and open source enthusiasts is not hard to see where this is going, definitely the problem is not the 3 seconds delay on launchYou could say that he got spoiled by most distros functioning properly.
Agreed. Its not the problem, its a symptom of the problem.I think the problem with snaps is that they doesn't follow the Open-Source Narrative, considering that most Linux users are free and open source enthusiasts is not hard to see where this is going, definitely the problem is not the 3 seconds delay on launch
I've read a lot of not nice things about Snaps.I think the problem with snaps is that they doesn't follow the Open-Source Narrative, considering that most Linux users are free and open source enthusiasts is not hard to see where this is going, definitely the problem is not the 3 seconds delay on launch
It's because I have EndeavourOS with LXQt and I'm not comfortable with the environment. PCManFM has the proclivity to get on my nerves. After ten tries or more, that's the last one with an ESP of less than 1GB, which is what their Calamares is asking for from "Erase disk" option.Sorry KGIII but I wouldn't go near Lubuntu ...
apt
and do the system update.