wizardfromoz wrote about binutils not being included in build-essential:
Notwithstanding that fact, it probably worth noting that all the other items listed in post #12 are also standalone packages, and that the package "build-essential" is not so much similarly a singular package, but rather a "metapackage", which means the term "build-essential" is referring to a collection of standalone packages. In its own words:
I can see a case for including binutils in the build-essential metapackage but the debian maintainer has his/her own reasons I guess for their decision.
I guess what is meant here is that it's a standalone package.It is its own package.
Notwithstanding that fact, it probably worth noting that all the other items listed in post #12 are also standalone packages, and that the package "build-essential" is not so much similarly a singular package, but rather a "metapackage", which means the term "build-essential" is referring to a collection of standalone packages. In its own words:
This package (build-essential) contains an informational list of packages which are considered essential for building Debian packages. This package also depends on the packages on that list, to make it easy to have the build-essential packages installed.
I can see a case for including binutils in the build-essential metapackage but the debian maintainer has his/her own reasons I guess for their decision.