Secure Boot

[dos2unix]

It seems most major distro's support Secure Boot these days. Arch is a noteable exception.

Unified Extensible Firmware Interface/Secure Boot - ArchWiki

The official installation image does not support Secure Boot (FS#53864). Secure Boot support was initially added in archlinux-2013.07.01-dual.iso and later removed in archlinux-2016.06.01-dual.iso. At that time prebootloader was replaced with efitools, even though the latter uses unsigned EFI binaries. There has been no support for Secure Boot in the official installation medium ever since.

SecureBoot - Debian Wiki

wiki.debian.org

Secureboot - Fedora Project Wiki

openSUSE:UEFI - openSUSE Wiki

en.opensuse.org

Interesting the non-vendor points of view. I see Mint has a community forum, but interestingly enough, no real formal documentation.

You are being redirected...

UEFI/SecureBoot - Ubuntu Wiki

Secure Boot Key Refresh - 2024

Over the next few days, updates will be released for Rocky Linux 8 and 9 updating a number of “critical path” components due to the expiration of the...

rockylinux.org

Working With UEFI Secure Boot

docs.oracle.com

How to use Secure Boot to validate startup software

There are many aspects to reducing a Linux server's security risks. Protecting the integrity and confidentiality of data is certainly important, and it's als...

www.redhat.com

Secure boot with AlmaLinux

The new AlmaLinux releases are coming shortly (expect our beta releases for 9.4 and 8.10 over the next couple of weeks!), and we’d like to talk about one of the vital components of each system - its security. It’s important to keep your system secure and one of the easiest ways that is rarely...

almalinux.org

It also appears that MX Linux does not support secure boot.

Can MXLinux be used with secure boot? - MX Linux Forum

However Parrot Linux does.

diysecuritytips.com - diysecuritytips Resources and Information.

diysecuritytips.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, diysecuritytips.com has it all. We hope you find what you are searching for!

diysecuritytips.com

A quick search gives mixed results with PuppyLinux, but it seems it does not. Again, no real documentation on it, mostly forum discussions.

"Secure Boot" for Puppy Linux - Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

forum.puppylinux.com

Kali Linux also does not like secure boot.

Installing Kali Linux | Kali Linux Documentation

Installing Kali Linux (single boot) on your computer is an easy process. This guide will cover the basic install (which can be done on bare metal or guest VM), with the option of encrypting the partition. At times, you may have sensitive data you would prefer to encrypt using Full Disk...

www.kali.org

In the UEFI settings, ensure that Secure Boot is disabled. The Kali Linux kernel is not signed and will not be recognized by Secure Boot.

 

[KGIII]

Most of those names coincide with the distros used in the professional enterprise sector. Being able to support secure boot, in that sector, is going to be pretty much mandatory (or so I'd assume). While I've been retired for a while, I don't think that's much of an assumption.

It's a fuzzy memory but I want to say that RHEL also does secure boot by default, during the installation process.

A quick look shows that they even have directions for setting it up after installation, if I'm reading it properly.

How to use Secure Boot to validate startup software

There are many aspects to reducing a Linux server's security risks. Protecting the integrity and confidentiality of data is certainly important, and it's als...

www.redhat.com

 

[dos2unix]

I've updated the list a little.

 

[dos2unix]

One thing I have learned going through this little exercise. Which distro's have pretty good documentation/wiki pages, and which distro's don't. If seems the only support from some distro' are the community forums more or less. No official documentation for some I was sure were more well documented.

 

[CaffeineAddict]

Which distro's have pretty good documentation/wiki pages, and which distro's don't.

distro without docs is like code without comments, you can stare at code or distro for days and still not being able to figure out what it does or how it works.

lack of docs (or comments in code) is so bad it's better to just walk away and save some nerves on frustration.

 

[KGIII]

Which distro's have pretty good documentation/wiki pages, and which distro's don't.

I suspect that those too will mostly coincide with commercial/professional offerings, though the Arch wiki would be an exception.