How to fix Conky's Ram and Storage Reading :(

archiman.ch5

Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2020
Messages
35
Reaction score
7
Credits
261
untitled.gif
 


JasKinasis

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2017
Messages
1,793
Reaction score
2,604
Credits
15,178
OK, taking a more detailed look at the image you’ve posted - The storage part looks OK to me.

The disk usage on the drive is only 31.8Gb.
The total storage space is just over 900Gb.
A quick bit of mental arithmetic puts the total disk usage to be between approximately 3% and 4%. So that bar looks correct to me.

The swap usage again is only roughly ~1%. So that looks good.

The only thing that looks off is the RAM reading..... -3.5Gb. I’m not sure what is causing this. The bar is wrong because the reading for the amount of memory used is wrong.

And the conky config itself looks ok. Maybe it’s a bug with conky itself?!
You’re running arch, so you’re on the bleeding edge. So perhaps this will be fixed the next time conky is updated?!
 
OP
archiman.ch5

archiman.ch5

Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2020
Messages
35
Reaction score
7
Credits
261
i face this problem only in arch... i use garuda linux which is based on arch and its working fine
 

flavio

New Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2017
Messages
17
Reaction score
13
Credits
80

I have seen this "negative RAM" bug in Conky, sometimes in a distro, sometimes in other distros, for more than 1 year, now.

First time, I have seen this bug in PCLinuxOS, August 2019 ─ but its team worked and corrected it.

Then, it happened in openSUSE Tumbleweed, at least in December 2019.

I cannot discard other cases, last year, because I didn't use a standard "label" to it in my screenshots, back then, and it is hard to find out now.

This year, I have found many cases ─ and the RAM usage at startup, when Conky turned back from "negative" to positive amount of RAM:

Code:
2019-08-16 - PCLinuxOS
2019-08-16 - PCLinuxOS
2019-08-16 - PCLinuxOS
2019-08-16 - PCLinuxOS
2019-08-29 - openSUSE
2019-12-19 - openSUSE      486 MiB
2019-12-19 - openSUSE      486 MiB
2020-01-07 - openSUSE      482 MiB
2020-07-16 - Fedora             607 MiB
2020-07-16 - Arch                 531 MiB
2020-07-16 - Void                 478 MiB
2020-07-16 - Void                 478 MiB
2020-07-19 - Mageia             601 MiB
2020-07-23 - Mageia             597 MiB
2020-07-23 - Fedora
2020-07-23 - Arch                  516 MiB
2020-07-23 - Arch                  519 MiB
2020-07-29 - Arch                  518 MiB
2020-08-01 - Void                   491 MiB
2020-08-01 - Mageia              613 MiB
2020-08-01 - Fedora              673 MiB
2020-08-01 - Fedora              673 MiB
2020-08-01 - Arch                  531 MiB
2020-08-02 - Fedora              662 MiB
2020-08-02 - Fedora              660 MiB
2020-08-02 - Arch          533 MiB
2020-08-19 - Arch          535 MiB
2020-08-19 - Arch          536 MiB
2020-08-22 - Arch          546 MiB
2020-09-02 - Arch          535 MiB
2020-09-04 - Arch          546 MiB
2020-09-19 - Arch          556 MiB
2020-09-19 - Arch          562 MiB
2020-09-24 - Arch          553 MiB
2020-10-04 - Arch          554 MiB
2020-10-05 - Arch          556 MiB
2020-10-05 - Arch          559 MiB

Back in July-August 2020, it stopped in Fedora, openSUSE, Mageia. ─ Now, Conky says they all use 900+ MiB RAM at startup ─ and that Void uses 700+ MiB RAM at startup.

I have never seen "negative" RAM usage in Debian ─ but now Conky says Debian is using 900+ MiB RAM at startup (and I don't believe it).

Just in Arch Conky keeps showing "negative" RAM usage ─ but at least, it doesn't show 900+ MiB in Arch.

EDIT

Negative RAM usage - Bug # 877 - August 2019
https://github.com/brndnmtthws/conky/issues/877

High CPU usage with conky (...) - Bug #876 - August 2019
https://github.com/brndnmtthws/conky/issues/876

Fix for #877 #878 - Aug 2019
https://github.com/brndnmtthws/conky/pull/878

Negative / too low memory reading - Bug #886 - September 2019
https://github.com/brndnmtthws/conky/issues/886
 
Last edited:

Members online


Latest posts

Top