Aptitude vs apt-get

Skybear

Active Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2026
Messages
233
Reaction score
205
Credits
1,818
I was reading the Debian Wiki when I came across a piece titled “Nine reasons why you should be using aptitude instead of apt-get or dselect.” https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/04/msg03138.html

There’s a lot of information in that article and I’m still going through it. But what do other people here think about it? Is using “aptitude” better than using “apt-get”?
 


I think aptitude is outdated, as is apt-get. The newest version of apt is the most capable. The Debian wiki is out of date on many, if not most, subjects. A wiki is a collaboration of lots of users, and not always the most modern, nor the most reliable source of information, from the big one, Wikipedia, on down. I've seen mistakes.
 
Last edited:
I don't think I have ever used Aptitude in all the years I have ran Debian.
the last time I used it must be the late 90's early 2000's and i have been using just apt [sudo apt update] as against apt-get since around 2015
 


Follow Linux.org

Members online


Top