I have been reading about how everyone is running away from Stream and ranting about how Red Hat ruined Cent OS and so on. I can understand the outrage since it changes life cycle of distro which is kind of a big deal. What I mean by that is, people are talking as if Cent OS Stream is Arch Linux. As far as I am aware, Cent OS Stream is a very solid project. It also has some (arguable) advantages over traditional Cent OS model.
www.techrepublic.com
What I am wondering is;
1. Does this change break anything?
2. Do you think Cent OS Stream has become a lesser quality product with more bugs and problems?
Hannah Knight from MakeUseOf seems to think so;
Let's be level headed about this topic in discussion as I see people get really emotional about FOSS. I appreciate your passion, but let's be civil here
PS: I found some funny news about source code restriction as well. It seems Oracle are the "good guys" now
www.theregister.com
I don't know about you guys, but I feel like Oracle Linux and Euro Linux are the main problem here. Think about it. Red Hat funds and releases the source code. Rocky Linux takes the code and makes another distro? No problem so far. Red Hat encouraged that until now. Then some other company starts making money from your product and stealing your customers? I think that's the problem Red Hat had with how his source code is used.

Clearing up the CentOS Stream confusion | TechRepublic
Jack Wallen attempts to not only clear the air about CentOS Stream, but offers up an apology to Red Hat for aiding the spread of confusion.

What I am wondering is;
1. Does this change break anything?
2. Do you think Cent OS Stream has become a lesser quality product with more bugs and problems?
Hannah Knight from MakeUseOf seems to think so;
Despite Red Hat's move to restrict the RHEL source code, developers will still be able to learn about recent developments in RHEL by analyzing CentOS Stream—a Red Hat-owned distribution that exists upstream of RHEL.
The code used in CentOS Stream is unfortunately unstable and actively in development, but it will provide valuable insight for third-party developers going forward.
Let's be level headed about this topic in discussion as I see people get really emotional about FOSS. I appreciate your passion, but let's be civil here

PS: I found some funny news about source code restriction as well. It seems Oracle are the "good guys" now


Oracle slams IBM's Red Hat over RHEL paywall
Big Blue is just a gold digger, says avid auditor of software licenses
I don't know about you guys, but I feel like Oracle Linux and Euro Linux are the main problem here. Think about it. Red Hat funds and releases the source code. Rocky Linux takes the code and makes another distro? No problem so far. Red Hat encouraged that until now. Then some other company starts making money from your product and stealing your customers? I think that's the problem Red Hat had with how his source code is used.
Last edited: