Purchase Linux CDs / DVDs / Flash Drives at OSDisc.com

Welcome to Our Community

While Linux.org has been around for a while, we recently changed management and had to purge most of the content (including users). If you signed up before April 23rd please sign up again. Thanks!

Which Command Line Text Editor do you prefer?

Discussion in 'Command Line' started by DeeNeely, Nov 2, 2011.

  1. DeeNeely

    DeeNeely Guest

    I prefer vim personally. I use it the most when modifying command files. It is not easy, but it is found on just about all the versions.



    Do you have a preference? If so, tell me why?
     
  2. tomfmason

    tomfmason Guest

    I still use pico/nano because it is old school and easy to use
     
  3. Rob

    Rob Guest

    I use vi/vim..

    Once you get the keys down, it's way faster to get in and edit something than any other text editor.. plus if you don't know vi, what are you going to use on systems that don't have emacs like FreeNAS, etc..? :)
     
  4. enhu

    enhu Guest

    Pico and nano aren't commandline text editor. I thinks its just vi. I know nothing else besides this editor. I think its a standard editor to all linux derivatives and that vi needs to be in the system incase you might want to edit kernel lines upon booting.

    Infact vi is present in bootable floppy disks.
     
  5. gcawood

    gcawood Guest

    I prefer Emacs... which I know isn't a favorite of the hardcore admins, but it works for me.
     
  6. MustangV10

    MustangV10 Guest

    I use pico, I've tried other editors, but so far pico is my favourite. A long time ago I thought Linux commands would be impossible to grasp, how wrong was I.
     
  7. DaReaper

    DaReaper Guest

    I prefer using nano for editing any kind of files over SSH. I used to use vi/vim/vm before i began using nano but wasn't comfortable with it .

    I also prefer using normal text editors like leafpad on debian.
     
  8. mrnothersan

    mrnothersan Guest

    I much prefer nano. I have tried vi, but can never get on with the close, save etc commands!
     
  9. KenJackson

    KenJackson Guest

    I prefer emn.

    What? You've never heard of it? OK, I'll provide it for you:
    Code:
    #!/bin/sh
    exec emacs -nw ${1+"[email protected]"}
     
  10. grim76

    grim76 Guest

    I am using vi/vim really haven't felt the need to try other editors.
     
  11. DaReaper

    DaReaper Guest

    Yes :D, Nano is much user-friendly and keyboard friend i suppose :p . But i'm guessing the other editors could have similar features.

    I find it simple to find/search keywords with nano : ctrl+w and various other shortcuts.
     
  12. arran

    arran Guest

    vi is the best and vim also. both are good in performance.
     
  13. santosh

    santosh Guest

    if i work on any text file ma mind goes on clicking towards vi/vim.....
     
  14. carbon333

    carbon333 Guest

    vim is suitable only for masochists :) I personally use 'joe'. It was more popular some time ago.
     
  15. cfajohnson

    cfajohnson Guest

    I use emacs for all my text editing needs: shell scripts, web pages, PostScript graphics, crossword clues, email and usenet (editing only, not for reading or sending messages), etc....
     
  16. netwar

    netwar Guest

    vi-8/10
    vim-7/10
    nano-7/10
    pico-6/10
    I guess for me i find myself using a mix of vi and nano to be honest, vi is available everywhere and has a decent interface but sometimes i like nano even though i take longer. ps to tomfmason vi is "oldschool" not nano which was made in 1999
     
  17. Kovax

    Kovax Guest

    vi for me...

    hjkl
     

Share This Page