Z
That's a truer view on compiling your own kernel (compared with that, compiling a merely downloaded kernel not meant for a given distribution sounds really easy). @DevynCJohnson (and whoever else has the experience), I have got a question that may be pertinent in this thread, but if it's too hijacking I can open my own annoying topic . If I strip off all things unrelated to my hardware from the Kernel, will it really improve performance considerably? Just asking...Sometimes, users configure and compile their own kernel to make a high-speed kernel specifically for their system. The kernels that come with Linux distros are very general, but users can make a stripped-down, fast kernel for their system.
It most likely would.That's a truer view on compiling your own kernel (compared with that, compiling a merely downloaded kernel not meant for a given distribution sounds really easy). @DevynCJohnson (and whoever else has the experience), I have got a question that may be pertinent in this thread, but if it's too hijacking I can open my own annoying topic . If I strip off all things unrelated to my hardware from the Kernel, will it really improve performance considerably? Just asking...
God, Arch is really fast already and it can fly higher... Ok, compiling one's very own kernel is a great goal, probably a power user must.It most likely would.
That's a truer view on compiling your own kernel (compared with that, compiling a merely downloaded kernel not meant for a given distribution sounds really easy). @DevynCJohnson (and whoever else has the experience), I have got a question that may be pertinent in this thread, but if it's too hijacking I can open my own annoying topic . If I strip off all things unrelated to my hardware from the Kernel, will it really improve performance considerably? Just asking...