D
Deleted member 128018
Guest
Seems the smart thing to do.I usually check to make sure the PPA has regular activity before I consider adding it.
Seems the smart thing to do.I usually check to make sure the PPA has regular activity before I consider adding it.
In general I usually read the PKGBUILD before I install it for the first time, also I mostly only install PKGBUILDS with a high vote count and high popularity when I do need a package from the AUR.LOL My original text was AUR but I decided PPAs were more popular/recognizable.
I'm generally pretty careful about which software I install - and how I install it.
from HERE
Librewolf
Librewolf is promoted as the community-maintained fork of Librefox: a privacy and security-focused browser however Librewolf is suffering from the same problems as Waterfox.
Librewolf is a set of scripts and patches that removes the Firefox telemetry feature among other things. However, a network dump reveals that the very first time Librewolf is started it immediately contacts the Mozilla add-on CDN, Amazon Cloudfront, and several other places even though automatic updates of extensions is disabled by default.
The network dump reveals some of the following domains and IP addresses (I have shortened the list):
While it is true that the project themselves do not collect any telemetry, the domains that the browser visits the very first time you open up the browser do log these requests.
- addons.cdn.mozilla.net
- server-13-33-240-122.hel50.r.cloudfront.net
- ec2-34-253-97-22.eu-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com
- content-signature-2.cdn.mozilla.net
- rt4bb146-89-147.routit.net
- invidio.us
- static.213-133-100-23.clients.your-server.de
- 132.145.233.26
- 52.142.124.215
- 167.99.237.63
- 194.187.168.100
Librewolf should not be bouncing around on the Internet without the user explicitly asking it to do so.
I thought someone had already mentioned this recent Distrowatch article, but perhaps it was elsewhere as I don't spot it here in this thread. To quote the article:After reading that link, I decided to check out the Falkon browser
My previous long-term browser, Falkon, appears to have been discontinued two years ago
I thought someone had already mentioned this recent Distrowatch article, but perhaps it was elsewhere as I don't spot it here in this thread. To quote the article:
Their GitLab development page seems to confirm at least a year without any significant changes to the code. Falkon may be okay for experimenting, but I don't think I'd make it my daily browser unless it returns to active development.
Sure, although I'd say "other devs" rather than "users." That's the beauty of open source. But you, as a user, can become a dev too. Many software projects have changed "maintainers" over the years.Have there been times where the users pick up the ball after the developers (of any software) drop it?
While it is true that the project themselves do not collect any telemetry, the domains that the browser visits the very first time you open up the browser do log these requests.
So now is the appimage or flatpak better?
what firejail do ?I was able to use Firejail Librewolf when I had the appimage.
I deleted the appimage and got LW from the flatpak.
I got the same errors as the following before:
When issuing the terminal command "firejail librewolf", the first lines of the error:Firejail librewolf error
It won't launch with errors: Warning: networking feature is disabled in Firejail configuration file ** Note: you can use --noprofile to disable default.profile ** /bin/bash: librewolf: command not found Is there something else that is required to use firejail and librewolf? This is how it was...linux.org
Reading profile /etc/firejail/default.profile
Reading profile /etc/firejail/disable.common.inc
Reading profile /etc/firejail/disable.passwdmgr.inc
Reading profile /etc/firejail/disable.programs.inc
Warning: networking feature is disabled in Firejail configuration file
---
There is another problem with flatpak. Flatpak can't be sandboxed with Firejail and its 'own' sandboxing seems a false security as reported in the following:
So now is the appimage or flatpak better?
----
I did ask this earlier about Brave. Brave is not in the default repositories.
So how did you get it to Mint?
You must have gone to https://brave.com/download/ to get it.
what firejail do ?
@Condobloke @Leonardo_B
So how did you get Brave?
You said you are using Brave, and it is not in the repositories.
@Condobloke @Leonardo_B
So how did you get Brave?
You said you are using Brave, and it is not in the repositories.
It comes with some profiles already, such as for Firefox. You can also create your own profiles and/or use the default configuration.
@Condobloke @Leonardo_B
So how did you get Brave?
You said you are using Brave, and it is not in the repositories.
sudo apt install apt-transport-https curl
sudo curl -fsSLo /usr/share/keyrings/brave-browser-archive-keyring.gpg https://brave-browser-apt-release.s3.brave.com/brave-browser-archive-keyring.gpg
echo "deb [signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/brave-browser-archive-keyring.gpg arch=amd64] https://brave-browser-apt-release.s3.brave.com/ stable main"|sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/brave-browser-release.list
sudo apt update
sudo apt install brave-browser
sudo apt install apt-transport-https curl
sudo curl -fsSLo /usr/share/keyrings/brave-browser-nightly-archive-keyring.gpg https://brave-browser-apt-nightly.s3.brave.com/brave-browser-nightly-archive-keyring.gpg
echo "deb [signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/brave-browser-nightly-archive-keyring.gpg arch=amd64] https://brave-browser-apt-nightly.s3.brave.com/ stable main"|sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/brave-browser-nightly.list
sudo apt update
sudo apt install brave-browser-nightly
Why we can't just fall into Google's hug