Servers vs Workstations, what's the difference?

dos2unix

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 3, 2019
Messages
3,489
Reaction score
3,221
Credits
31,259

Linux Servers vs. Linux Workstations: Key Differences​

Linux is a versatile operating system used in various environments, from personal computers to large-scale data centers. However, the requirements and configurations of Linux servers and Linux workstations differ significantly. Here, we explore the key differences between the two.

1. Purpose and Usage

  • Linux Servers: Designed to manage network resources, host websites, run applications, and provide services to other computers. They are optimized for performance, reliability, and security in handling multiple simultaneous requests.
  • Linux Workstations: Intended for individual use, often by developers, designers, or engineers. They are optimized for tasks that require significant computational power and graphical capabilities, such as software development, graphic design, and video editing.

2. Hardware Configuration

  • Servers: Typically run headless, meaning they operate without a monitor, keyboard, or mouse. This is especially practical in large data centers with hundreds or thousands of servers, where connecting peripherals to each system would be impractical. Servers generally have more storage, RAM, and CPU cores to handle high workloads and ensure uptime. Most servers do not have discrete video cards, but there are exceptions, such as bitcoin miners, which often have multiple high-end video cards used for computational tasks rather than video output.
  • Workstations: Usually equipped with discrete video cards (e.g., Radeon or Nvidia) to support graphical applications. They often have an X Window System (X11) GUI installed to provide a user-friendly interface for various applications.

3. Software and GUI

  • Servers: Often run without a graphical user interface (GUI) to conserve system resources and enhance security. Instead, they are managed through command-line interfaces (CLI) and remote management tools like SSH (Secure Shell).
  • Workstations: Typically have a GUI installed, such as GNOME, KDE, or XFCE, to facilitate user interaction. This makes it easier for users to run applications, manage files, and perform other tasks.

4. Network and Security

  • Servers: Prioritize network performance and security. They are configured to handle multiple network connections and are often equipped with advanced security measures, such as firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and regular security updates.
  • Workstations: While security is still important, the focus is more on usability and performance for individual tasks. Workstations may have less stringent security configurations compared to servers.

5. Maintenance and Management

  • Servers: Require regular maintenance to ensure they are running efficiently and securely. This includes monitoring system performance, applying updates, and managing backups. Automated tools and scripts are often used to streamline these tasks.
  • Workstations: Maintenance is typically less intensive and can often be managed by the user. Updates and backups are still important but are usually less frequent and critical compared to servers.

6. Scalability and Redundancy

  • Servers: Designed for scalability and redundancy. They can be clustered together to handle increased loads and ensure high availability. Redundant hardware components, such as power supplies and network interfaces, are common to prevent downtime.
  • Workstations: Generally not designed for scalability or redundancy. They are standalone systems meant for individual use, and while they can be powerful, they do not typically include redundant components.

7. Distribution Options

  • Fedora and Ubuntu: Both Fedora and Ubuntu offer separate installation ISOs for workstations and servers. While these distributions provide GNOME as a desktop environment option, most server installations choose not to install the X Window System (X11) to conserve resources and enhance security. This flexibility allows users to tailor their installations to specific needs, whether for a server or a workstation environment.

8. Scripting and Automation

  • Servers: In large data centers, scripting and automating tasks via the command line is crucial. This allows administrators to efficiently manage hundreds or thousands of servers, performing tasks such as updates, backups, and monitoring without the need for a GUI. Automation tools like Ansible, Puppet, and Chef are commonly used.
  • Workstations: While scripting is still possible, many tasks are performed through the GUI, which can make automation more challenging. However, developers and power users often use scripts to streamline their workflows.

9. Troubleshooting Tools

  • Servers: Most troubleshooting tools are command-line only, which is ideal for headless operation and remote management. Tools like ethtool, iostat, netstat, lsof, fsck, top, and ping are commonly used for diagnosing and resolving issues. Commands like systemctl status -l, journalctl -xeu, and viewing log files are typically executed from the command line. While there may be some GUI equivalents, they are less common and not as widely used in server environments.
  • Workstations: While command-line tools are also available and used, GUI-based tools are more prevalent for troubleshooting and system management. This can make it easier for users who prefer graphical interfaces to diagnose and resolve issues.

By understanding these differences, you can better appreciate the distinct roles that Linux servers and workstations play in various computing environments. Whether you're setting up a server for a web application or configuring a workstation for software development, choosing the right configuration is crucial for optimal performance and efficiency.
 
Last edited:


Workstation is where you work and make money, server is someone who comes around every hour or so with tea and coffee to save you from stop working to have a break.

rotfl_emoji__taunt__by_animeautoproject_dgb7e30-fullview.png
 

Popular Linux Distros with Both Server and Workstation ISOs:​

  1. Ubuntu: Offers both server and desktop versions.
  2. Debian: Provides both server and desktop ISOs.
  3. Fedora: Has Fedora Server and Fedora Workstation.
  4. CentOS: Available in both server and desktop versions.
  5. openSUSE: Offers openSUSE Leap for both server and desktop use.

Popular Linux Distros Without a Designated Server ISO:​

  1. Linux Mint: Primarily focused on desktop use and does not have a dedicated server ISO.
  2. Kali Linux: Primarily a penetration testing distribution, without a specific server ISO
  3. MX Linux: Focuses on desktop environments and does not offer a dedicated server ISO
  4. Parrot OS: Geared towards security and penetration testing, without a specific server ISO
  5. Puppy Linux: Primarily focused on desktop use and does not have a dedicated server ISO.

Popular Server-Only Linux Distros:​

  1. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL): A leading enterprise-grade server OS
  2. AlmaLinux: A community-driven, enterprise-grade server
  3. Rocky Linux: Another enterprise-grade server OS, designed to be a downstream, binary-compatible version of RHEL
 
Last edited:
I'm using Debian to run an anonymous ftp server and a web server on my workstation. I only have the one computer so I had to use it to perform both tasks. I must say though, it is certainly better, from a security perspective, to use separate computers when running a server and a workstation so the user's personal files are not put at risk if a system running a server is breached. I have the ftp server's file and directories owned by root:ftp and the web server's files and directories are owned by root:web. The servers generally have read-only group access so if the server is breached the attacker will not be able to screw up the server without gaining additional privileges first. I also use ACLs to lock the servers out of any setuid and setgid programs to prevent such privilege escalation. The ftp server uses chroot to keep users from exploring any directories outside of the anonymous ftp server's space. A server that uses chroot should be at least two subdirectories deep so it never has a direct reference to the system's real root directory. I never run a server as root. I always use very non-privileged system accounts for this purpose so if a server is ever breached the attacker is extremely limited in what they can do. I recently locked the web user out of all of the normal user commands in /usr/bin and /usr/sbin, along with some other directories, to make it virtually impossible to do anything if an attacker breaches the web server with a web shell. They can't even run cat or ls.

Capabilities can by given to the server program in the file system to allow a non-privileged user to perform special tasks like using chroot or binding to privileged ports below 1025. Note that using NoNewPrivileges=true in the systemd unit file will prevent the use of such capabilities. If you want to protect your system even more you can use ProtectProc=invisible in that systemd unit file to make the processes of other users of the system invisible to the program being run by that systemd uniti file. You might also use ProtectKernelTunables=true and RestrictSUIDSGID=true to further secure your system.

I also use my Debian Linux desktop to connect two different local networks together. I have a wifi AP to provide extended wifi coverage on a different wifi channel instead of using a wifi repeater on the same channel to avoid adding network congestion. The AP is connected to the desktop computer with Ethernet cable. Then the desktop uses a wifi dongle to connect to the wifi router in the living room on another wifi band to complete the link. Connecting new users to the relay allows me to use my desktop computer to monitor their data usage in real time using slurm to ensure they aren't using up too much of my Internet data.

Signed,

Matthew Campbell
 
I used to work for a small business that was owned by a former Dell manager. He insisted that, from the time he bought his company we would use only Dell servers, workstation, and laptops and that policy never caused us any problems. His take on the fundamental difference between servers and laptops, at the hardware level, was. "More fans".

He said heat is the enemy and a system that needs to run reliably 24/7 needs to be kept cool, other than that a server is just a big PC. While both of those things are true, one doesn't spec out a server the way one would spec out a workstation. Considerations like the use or non-use of ECC RAM, dual power supplies, hardware RAID, high end graphics, high-speed and/or multiple network interfaces, etc will vary with the intended purpose (and the allotted budget).
 
Price is quite a difference between servers and workstations.

Also, some servers we just recently bought, hold up to 24 SSD drives, and 24 slots of RAM.


Start adding hard drives and RAM, and the price goes up from there.

One client asked for these. I don't they have been purchased yet.


I could get a few nice cars, or maybe a decent house for that price.
Keep in mind, that's the "no hard drives, and no RAM installed" price.
 
Last edited:
Popular Server-Only Linux Distros
These three have workstation variants. RHEL does, and Alma and Rocky being derivatives from it through the CentOS Stream repositories, do too.

E.g.: in https://rockylinux.org/download

IMG_1111.jpeg


EDIT: reduce the size of the image, that my phone set to size=ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
These three have workstation variants. RHEL does, and Alma and Rocky being derivatives from it through the CentOS Stream repositories, do too.

I haven't found Alma Workstation images yet, but I don't doubt they may exist.

For redhat, I haven't really seen Workstation iso's you can download, only AWS cloud VMs.

Thanks for the links to Rocky.
 
Last edited:
I have been testing the three of them a while ago in virtual machines (until I deleted my system being "too old to be newb") and as far as I remember, the default image of Alma is a like for like in terms of packages and services, GDM, Gnome,... with the Rocky one.
 
For redhat, I haven't really seen Workstation iso's you can download, only AWS cloud VMs.

Sign up for the free 'developer' account and you get three instances for personal use/development.

The .iso is then available, though I could have sworn you could download it even without signing in but I've not played with RHEL in some months.
 
The .iso is then available, though I could have sworn you could download it even without signing in

1736048654485.png


I have both developer and enterprise accounts for redhat. I did have to login. But there is an iso. :)

1736048881644.png


I'm downloading it now.
 


Members online


Latest posts

Top