Richard Matthew Stallman – The Father Of Free Software Foundation

Condobloke

Well-Known Member
Credits
6,423


GNU Project – Free Software Foundation

In 1983 Matthew Stallman started GNU project. He was sure that he is the chosen one to give users freedom by creating Free Software. This project was not just a technical job, it had political, ethical and social meaning.

The main target of GNU project was freedom, which anyone has the right to have.

Freedom includes that users can:

  • Run software for any purpose as they wish;
  • Have access to the source code;
  • Copy the software;
  • Modify the program;
  • Distribute and share with others.
In 1985 was published the GNU Manifesto.

Free Software guarantees via license all rights to their users. Free software doesn’t mean that it is “non-commercial”, you may buy it, but at the same time you buy not only the program, you buy all rights to use as you like.

Open Source vs Free Software
Richard Stallman is known as a person, who fight all his life for right definitions of his project. He even will refuse any interview if he will be not sure that you will use the same definitions that he means. This point is the source of misunderstandings between free software and open source community. The main difference is that open source is a model of development, while free software is an idea and political movement.
 


jglen490

Well-Known Member
Credits
3,589
While free software as opposed to open software may be a distinction, in reality it is a distinction without a difference. He can be as stubborn as he wants to be, and certainly has the right to be so. Yes, he started the free software movement, and that movement evolved to encompass open software, like it or not.
 

Condobloke

Well-Known Member
Credits
6,423
Much Ado about Nothing
 

digitard

Member
Credits
406
What I want is to pay for my free software and I also want qualified free hardware for that software. For now all I can do is to donate a small amount of money that an Internet services owe to me either to Debian or to Blender or both, directly if possible.

Only an open source software can be considered free, and if an open source software it's not intended to be free then it is either stolen or leaked. So stop arguing over semantics and make some good stuff towards security and people will donate, because you addressing the right people that way.
 
Last edited:

70 Tango Charlie

Well-Known Member
Credits
1,286

Mike13Foxtrot

Member
Credits
277
One can be principled, or not. Principles in "free" software arena doth not a scholar make. Even a smart person can say a dumb thing. If the quotes are accurate....Ooopps. MIT and anywhere else Epstein gave money to, should use the same amount to do something good. Such as help with human trafficking, around the world.

Linus Torvalds took a sabbatical, who knew that a Geek at heart may not be a good people person? "I need to step back and take a break....to learn how to behave...."

My copies of Windows over the years were never free to download. ;) Used to get Linux distros in magazines. Now with speeds on the net, grab an ISO and GO.

But free is only good when it is actually GOOD.
 

Members online


Latest posts

Top