i doubt it, but i thought i would ask - have they created a gui way to download and install firefox ESR (i've looked at the terminal instructions and i'm way too stupid to do all of that and from what i've read it rarely goes smoothly)
thx
thx
$ sudo apt update
$ sudo apt install firefox-esr
$ sudo apt upgrade
The Ubuntu and Linux-Mint repos don't contain a firefox-esr version so it will not be installable via the gui software manager either.1. it doesn't work. i told you it doesn't work. why did you recommend it? here's the error;
E: Package 'firefox-esr' has no installation candidate
Tone it down it notch you make it sound as if someone betrayed you. All they did was take the time to try and help you, it's not like like they scammed you and stole your money and keep it mind people here volunteer their free time to try and help others it's not like you are paying for their time. There is an official Ubuntu Mozilla Team ppa for it which you could probably use, so if you used the ppa it will most likely also be installable through the software manager.2. i don't know what synaptic is and please don't try and explain it to me. you were wrong above so i cannot trust you.
1. Open a terminal and run the following.got it. no gui install. thank you. thats all i was asking.
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:mozillateam/ppa
sudo apt update
I was going to propose AppImage but it might have confused the OP further telling by how he/she answered me later. I'm right now on EndeavourOS MATE using the AppImage for Firefox v112, which still could have issues sometimes with trying to get an open file requester. Such as needing to upload an avatar to this forum. I had to dragon drop from Caja. It doesn't happen to me with Brave browser because that was installed from the AUR. (Ouch)
It is also not beginner friendly. Myself, I use the appimage version of Librewolf, but I had to manually add it to the application menu, download and set an icon for it etc. I also update it manually by downloading a new version and moving it to /usr/local/bin. So, no - I wouldn't recommend this method to someone new to Linux.Well it is a non-risky method - just make it executable and away you go without mucking up your system.
To be fair, a correctly-built AppImage, utilising the current AppImage framework, WILL ask if you want a Menu entry added even before it fires up for the first time. I get the definite impression that many AppImage packagers are using an older version of the framework to build them.It is also not beginner friendly. Myself, I use the appimage version of Librewolf, but I had to manually add it to the application menu, download and set an icon for it etc. I also update it manually by downloading a new version and moving it to /usr/local/bin. So, no - I wouldn't recommend this method to someone new to Linux.
Yep. The whole situation is a bit disappointing, IMO.To be fair, a correctly-built AppImage, utilising the current AppImage framework, WILL ask if you want a Menu entry added even before it fires up for the first time. I get the definite impression that many AppImage packagers are using an older version of the framework to build them.
Mike.![]()