Does anyone here REALLY use slackware as their main OS?

seymourskinner

New Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2023
Messages
7
Reaction score
4
Credits
58
Slackware-2.1.0.png
 


I did for a few years. It seems like there are a couple of people who still use it as their main driver here.

@captain-sensible
 
Not used for many a year, there are two sayings, "horses for courses" or its Marmite [Vegemite] you love it or hate it,
as a distribution, I found it no better nor worse than any other, It is not what I would consider newbie friendly and as such never appears on my recommended list,
 
Slackware is, of course, incredibly stable. 'Slacko' Puppies are considered the most stable members of the kennels by a country mile. But it's remained true to its mid-90s roots; it only JUST gets you to a functional desktop, anything you want you're expected to compile/build/install yourself; it doesn't track dependencies, not does it track updates. Even the package management system is largely a product of community cooperation.....it's "nothing to do with" Patrick Volkerding at all. It's the oldest still maintained distro extant, and it shows.....the whole ethos is still mired in the early days from almost 3 decades ago. And the funniest bit has to be that its enthusiastic community considers this state of affairs to be perfectly normal..!

It's never had a 'regular' release schedule at all. In the early years, there were often 3 or 4 releases a year. In recent years, the frequency has dropped WAY off.....like 2 years between 14.1 & 14.2, then over 5 years to 15.0. Volkerding has stated quite categorically that "it gets released as & when I consider it's ready".

You also cannot try it out as a 'Live session', to take it for a test run. The installer is not user-friendly, being text-based; indeed, the whole thing would appeal mainly to geeks from the early, formative years of Linux, who mostly had UNIX backgrounds.....and probably developers.

But there's a ton of enthusiasts out there who think it's the best thing since sliced bread.

(*shrug*)


Mike. ;)
 
Last edited:
You also cannot try it out as a 'Live session', to take it for a test run.

You can do that now. I've not tested it since 14.2, but there's this:

https://download.liveslak.org/ (I've played with a previous incarnation.)

I think there's a way to have a GUI installer, as well. I've never tried as I'm content with the distros I use.

As the oldest distro, it's also often accompanied with, "Is Slackware dead yet?" (Usually tongue in cheek.)
 
As the oldest distro, it's also often accompanied with, "Is Slackware dead yet?" (Usually tongue in cheek.)
I got updated not so long ago, didn't it? What was that, the first update in a decade?
 
My first Distro if you can call it that back in the mid 90's was slckware. But over time I got lazy and was lured away by then Redhat. and many distros since. i still have a fondness for Slack but as I said got lazy. Did packaging for a now defunct Distro named Vector for a while a good slack desktop version which was quite nice. But the Dev's got tired I think and gave up the project. In todays world Slack is Stable almost too stable but still require a lot of time to keep up dated and working well.

So I've moved on for better or worse.
 
I have always used either a Debian or Ubuntu based OS myself, never actually used Slackware
 
Slackware lacked a package manager for a long time in the early days which made it less appealing, less convenient and more laborious than distros using apt (dpkg) and rpm. The cry used to be "tar.gz is a package manager NOT!" Then there were the 24 floppies that it came on when others used CDs. It's default hostname "darkstar" was regarded with irony for the distro still in the dark and a distant sky object from the rest. In fact however, it was an excellent distro, reliable, no less capable than any other distro, just it's own fiddly thing.
 
Slackware lacked a package manager for a long time in the early days which made it less appealing, less convenient and more laborious than distros using apt and rpm. The cry used to be "tar.gz is a package manager NOT!" Then there were the 24 floppies that it came on when others used CDs. It's default hostname "darkstar" was regarded with irony for the distro still in the dark and a distant sky object from the rest. In fact however, it was an excellent distro, reliable, no less capable than any other distro, just it's own fiddly thing.
I remember the 24 floppies I ordered to first put slack on my machine. Actually got 25 floppies as I ordered them via a ham Radio web site and the 25th floppy came with extra ham software which had to be built to install. Was lots of fun. But when Redhat came out with their boxed set don't remember the version but it was sold in Staples office stores. I bought that and installed readhat on my machine. We only had dialup back then so buying the discs was the way it was done. Been a lot of years since then and I like the new distros better now :)
 
I remember the 24 floppies
Shush don't tell anyone but I still have a full set of MS dos+ Windows 3 somewhere, but its a long time since I have seen a 16 bit machine
 
I've used it for 10 years and have never had a problem.
Very stable and the documentation is good.
 
I've used it for 10 years and have never had a problem.
Very stable and the documentation is good.
Can't go unstable if you don't update it... like at all!
 
I have been using Slackware for over 20 years. It was my first Linux distribution. However, the community is not the same as it used to be. I feel like the core expertise of the early Slackers, the enthusiasts, is no longer present. That's why I will probably switch to Debian in the near future. My router/NAS has been running stably on Debian for many years already. It will likely happen shortly after Debian Bookworm is released.
 
If you're thinking to switch to Debian, you may need to learn about systemd, but if you don't want to learn something new, go with Devuan - it's Debian without systemd.
 
Like I said, my router/NAS has been running on Debian for many years, so I'm very familiar with systemd.
 
I have been using Slackware for over 20 years. It was my first Linux distribution. However, the community is not the same as it used to be. I feel like the core expertise of the early Slackers, the enthusiasts, is no longer present. That's why I will probably switch to Debian in the near future. My router/NAS has been running stably on Debian for many years already. It will likely happen shortly after Debian Bookworm is released.
Like you I too have discovered that the enthusiasm and drive of Slackers is not there anymore. I noticed a decline in some of the Slackware Forums about 5 years ago.
It was my experience that some of the members in those forms didn't illustrate or practice much empathy, kindness <or> respect to new or old Slackware users.

I'll continue to run Slackware regardless and practice my dedication to assisting others who want to learn and run it:-:)
 

Members online


Latest posts

Top