Can you really consider linux distros based off of arch, a solely arch-based distro?
- Thread starter reonized
- Start date
Brickwizard
Well-Known Member
IMO no, arch is a fully developed distribution, LFS is a collection of base code on which you need to build a usable distribution,
All Linux builds share the same base codes so they are all related.
INFO.
The first text based Linux was 1992,HJ Lu Linux 0.12
The first GUI Linux was TAMU 1.0A. later in 1992
All Linux builds share the same base codes so they are all related.
INFO.
The first text based Linux was 1992,HJ Lu Linux 0.12
The first GUI Linux was TAMU 1.0A. later in 1992
There are only a few 'real' distros, those that actually compile the software, all others are 'spins' of these distros.
Does it matter? Of course not, as they are all using the Linux kernel & GNU software, only the package managers differ.
Does it matter? Of course not, as they are all using the Linux kernel & GNU software, only the package managers differ.
