Which Command Line Text Editor do you prefer?

Discussion in 'Command Line' started by DeeNeely, Nov 1, 2011.

  1. DeeNeely

    DeeNeely New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2011
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    2
    I prefer vim personally. I use it the most when modifying command files. It is not easy, but it is found on just about all the versions.

    Do you have a preference? If so, tell me why?

     
  2. tomfmason

    tomfmason New Member Staff Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2011
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    6
    I still use pico/nano because it is old school and easy to use
     
  3. Rob

    Rob Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2011
    Messages:
    606
    Likes Received:
    271
    I use vi/vim..

    Once you get the keys down, it's way faster to get in and edit something than any other text editor.. plus if you don't know vi, what are you going to use on systems that don't have emacs like FreeNAS, etc..? :)
     
  4. enhu

    enhu New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    5
    Pico and nano aren't commandline text editor. I thinks its just vi. I know nothing else besides this editor. I think its a standard editor to all linux derivatives and that vi needs to be in the system incase you might want to edit kernel lines upon booting.

    Infact vi is present in bootable floppy disks.
     
  5. gcawood

    gcawood Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2011
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    19
    I prefer Emacs... which I know isn't a favorite of the hardcore admins, but it works for me.
     
  6. MustangV10

    MustangV10 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    3
    I use pico, I've tried other editors, but so far pico is my favourite. A long time ago I thought Linux commands would be impossible to grasp, how wrong was I.
     
  7. DaReaper

    DaReaper New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2012
    Messages:
    183
    Likes Received:
    4
    I prefer using nano for editing any kind of files over SSH. I used to use vi/vim/vm before i began using nano but wasn't comfortable with it .

    I also prefer using normal text editors like leafpad on debian.
     
  8. mrnothersan

    mrnothersan New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    I much prefer nano. I have tried vi, but can never get on with the close, save etc commands!
     
  9. KenJackson

    KenJackson Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2011
    Messages:
    129
    Likes Received:
    28
    I prefer emn.

    What? You've never heard of it? OK, I'll provide it for you:
    Code:
    #!/bin/sh
    exec emacs -nw ${1+"$@"}
     
  10. grim76

    grim76 Active Member Staff Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    48
    I am using vi/vim really haven't felt the need to try other editors.
     
  11. DaReaper

    DaReaper New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2012
    Messages:
    183
    Likes Received:
    4
    Yes :D, Nano is much user-friendly and keyboard friend i suppose :p . But i'm guessing the other editors could have similar features.

    I find it simple to find/search keywords with nano : ctrl+w and various other shortcuts.
     
  12. arran

    arran Guest

    vi is the best and vim also. both are good in performance.
     
  13. santosh

    santosh New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2012
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    if i work on any text file ma mind goes on clicking towards vi/vim.....
     
  14. carbon333

    carbon333 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    7
    vim is suitable only for masochists :) I personally use 'joe'. It was more popular some time ago.
     
  15. cfajohnson

    cfajohnson New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2012
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    I use emacs for all my text editing needs: shell scripts, web pages, PostScript graphics, crossword clues, email and usenet (editing only, not for reading or sending messages), etc....
     
  16. netwar

    netwar New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2012
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    vi-8/10
    vim-7/10
    nano-7/10
    pico-6/10
    I guess for me i find myself using a mix of vi and nano to be honest, vi is available everywhere and has a decent interface but sometimes i like nano even though i take longer. ps to tomfmason vi is "oldschool" not nano which was made in 1999
     
  17. Kovax

    Kovax Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2014
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    19
    vi for me...

    hjkl
     

Share This Page