StratOS?

Discussion in 'General Linux' started by ryanvade, Jun 20, 2014.

  1. ryanvade

    ryanvade Administrator Staff Member Staff Writer

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2012
    Messages:
    1,858
    Likes Received:
    654
    Last edited: Jun 20, 2014
    DevynCJohnson likes this.
  2. Darren Hale

    Darren Hale Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2013
    Messages:
    550
    Likes Received:
    217
    Free doesn't mean price and the GPL according to RMS allows for a company to charge for it.

    No different to Red Hat seems fair to me. Price is hardly steep.
     
    ryanvade likes this.
  3. DevynCJohnson

    DevynCJohnson Well-Known Member Staff Member Staff Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2013
    Messages:
    1,635
    Likes Received:
    1,276
    It is the same concept as RedHat. People pay for the support. But how does RedHat get around the loophole of GPL = free? Well, RedHat does offer their system for free - if you can find the free download page. The real question is - Where does StratOS offer the free, fully-functional download?

    **cough**
    http://www.linux.org/threads/red-hat-rhel-download.5913/
    **cough**

    :D
     
    ryanvade likes this.
  4. ryanvade

    ryanvade Administrator Staff Member Staff Writer

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2012
    Messages:
    1,858
    Likes Received:
    654
    I know how Red Hat does there stuff, and I have no problem with how they do it, but TechnoRun seems to be different. From their Facebook page:
    I don't like em. But it is legal...:mad:
     
    DevynCJohnson likes this.
  5. Darren Hale

    Darren Hale Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2013
    Messages:
    550
    Likes Received:
    217
    "The GPL license allows you to create closed source projects running on Linux, if you provide the source code to your Kernel. We have a license from Ubuntu, allowing us to make the OS running on Linux, a closed source project. However, if you want the source code to the Kernel used, we provide it from our Website."

    Yeah with you now that is pretty bad even Xandros - (yeah that's going back a bit I'm an old fart) offered a free if somewhat crippled version and Elive gives you a functioning system.

    Man Linux has become very commercial.

    I stick with free as freedom, charge what you need to supply support to cover your costs.

    Anyway sorry Ryan didn't realise all the facts.
     
  6. ryanvade

    ryanvade Administrator Staff Member Staff Writer

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2012
    Messages:
    1,858
    Likes Received:
    654
    Nothing to be sorry about. :)
     
  7. Yesyesloud

    Yesyesloud Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2013
    Messages:
    341
    Likes Received:
    178
    strut dat os
     
  8. MikeyD

    MikeyD Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2013
    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    119
    I agree it leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Unlike Red Hat or Novell, this company isn't exactly dealing with huge enterprise server clusters that require zero down time. I'd more consider this in the vein of Microsoft as you're literally paying for the software and considering (from the website pics) it looks exactly like Ubuntu, it seems more like a trap to catch naive or new Linux users and a definite waste of money.

    I much prefer this stratos.
     

Share This Page