Interview with Michael Robertson, CEO of Lindows.com
Michael J. Jordan, Linux Online Staff
May 25, 2001
This week we're pleased to interview Michael Robertson, CEO of
Lindows. com.
Since the first announcement for Lindows, this new distribution has
caused some controversy. The word 'vaporware' became associated it in
the beginning. Subsequent pre-releases proved that false, but the idea
that you were going to be charged for the unfinished product as well as
having to sign a non-disclosure agreement to try it just displaced
that controversy and created another. Added to this was the fact that
some Open Source heavy hitters began raising some objections to the Lindows
modus operandi. CodeWeavers, major contributor to the
WINE project (Windows emulation software- a big part of Lindows) stopped collaborating with
the project. Bruce Perens, one of the of founders Open Source Initiative,
wrote an
open letter chiding the Lindows CEO for what he felt was Robertson's apparent lack
of understanding of just what the term Open Source means. This letter was prompted by some
critical
remarks made by Robertson after Bradley Kuhn, of the Free Software
Foundation, made some statements about possible violations of the GPL on the
part of the Lindows project.
As if problems on the Linux side of things weren't enough,
while all this was going on, Microsoft and their infamous legal department
rushed in to make issue of the name, accusing Robertson's company
of trademark infringement. The community of Linux users and
enthusiasts has not rushed in as quickly to defend Lindows in their fight
against the Redmond software giant as has been its custom when
Microsoft points its heavy guns at something in the Linux camp. Its response has
been, as far as can be gauged from reading the technical press in the
past months, one of ambivalence at best. Luckily for Michael
Robertson, and for anyone who wants to continue using the
term 'windows' in a generic way (including, it would seem, the people who make
the glass variety), the name Lindows is a perfectly valid
name and shouldn't present a problem for Microsoft.
Despite all of the controversy, the Lindows team continues
working on their goal of producing a new generation of Linux
distribution - one they hope makes the transition from using Microsoft
Windows to Linux much easier. Our goal was to get the story about
Lindows from Michael Robertson himself and he was good enough to take time
to answer our questions about both the controversy and the business and techincal
aspects of Lindows. We hope to go beyond the controversy to give
our visitors a 'just the facts' interview so those who may be considering using Lindows
can make a decision about this distribution for themselves.
Linux Online:
When and why did you get started with the Lindows project and why did you choose Linux as the base for your operating system?
Michael Robertson:
MS Windows 98 was the most sold OS last year. It is a very wobbly
system that has frequent crashes. LindowsOS offers a more stable,
modern operating system for all users.
Linux Online:
Microsoft soon got the legal department out to try to get you to change
the name. Why do you think Microsoft singled out your project?
Michael Robertson:
Microsoft's claim that that the average computer user is too
dumb to tell the difference between "Microsoft Windows," and "Lindows
OS" is just another way for them to squash competition before it
emerges. The courts have agreed that there is no trademark violation,
and that users are intelligent enough to tell the difference between the
products. An outside survey conducted on visitors of Lindows.com found
that there is no confusion. Thousands of computer products use parts or
all of the "Windows" term. From "Winamp" to "Window Blinds," Microsoft
has never sued any of these companies. They are simply
anti-competition.they have no interest in a level playing field, and
have used many tactics (legal and illegal) to maintain their monopoly
over people's computers.
Linux Online:
Do you think that the Microsoft trademark case has been positive or
negative for Lindows.com's public image?
Michael Robertson:
The lawsuit has been great for the Lindows.com public image.
The courts have been a catalyst for us, because the world has been given
yet another opportunity to see just how far Microsoft is willing to go
to maintain their monopoly. It is unfortunate that Microsoft's pursuing
a lawsuit against us has cost us a lot of time and money, delaying the
release of LindowsOS. However, we have been undeterred by this ploy of
eliminating the competition, and have been making great advancements
with LindowsOS, and thanks to the lawsuit we have seen a continual rise
in interest for Lindows.com.
Linux Online:
When you released your first beta of LindowsOS those interested in
trying it had to pay for it, plus sign a non-disclosure agreement. What
was the purpose in releasing it in this way?
Michael Robertson:
The $99 fee is not for a "beta." While it is true that
LindowsOS is still in a testing phase, the small fee buys a year's
membership to the Lindows.com Insiders www.lindows.com/signup. It not
only entitles insiders to the preview releases as soon as they become
available, but gives them access to the Click-N-Run Warehouse, forums,
access to Lindows.com staff, and gives them a copy of the final release
of LindowsOS when it becomes available. For more information on what
Insiders receive when they sign up, visit www.lindows.com/signup
Linux Online:
The GPL issues have created a controversy in the Linux community. You
will be releasing the source code in the future, but not at present. Can
you give your reasons for preferring non-disclosure over the standard
release of source code under the GPL at this stage?
Michael Robertson:
We are in compliance on this, (see www.net2.com/lindows/source)
Moreover, We're a big supporter of many of the open source
initiatives and have contributed financially, organizationally and with
code. We've hosted and sponsored wineconf 2002 and are also a sponsor of
the Debian conference this summer. We've actually invested millions of
actual dollars in open source projects and companies in the 7 months
we've been a company.
Linux Online:
In responding to your critics you say you've given a lot back to the
Linux community. Could you talk about some of those contributions Lindows
has made to the Linux world as a whole?
Michael Robertson:
I'm happy to outline some of the things that we've done, but I believe
you let your actions speak for themselves. People who have followed my
career at MP3.com will hopefully recognize that we battled for the consumer at
every step. We battled for open formats. We were involved in court battles
over the legality of MP3, portable MP3 players, consumers rights to fair
use with content they purchased. We hosted the MP3 Summit annually which helped
increase momentum and support for MP3 which helped create the standard
which is MP3 today. We fought against secure music schemes. And we made
contributions to open source software since MP3.com was entirely LAMP
based.
If Linux could get to 5% market share (ala Apple), look at the incredible
things that would happen. Hardware manufacturers will ship Linux drivers
for their peripheral devices in the box. Computer stores will dedicate
sections of their store. Major OEMs would ship computers with Linux. It's a
travesty you can't walk into major retailers today and buy a computer running
Linux. If we can get to 5% markets hare, an ecosystem of healthy Linux companies
will emerge which will be around for the long run.
While the code is important more developers are not the most pressing
needs for Linux to get to 20 million desktops. Some of it is financial, but
equally important is better marketing and lobbying to help more people
understand the value of open source. And yes, battling Microsoft and
their huge coffers which influences OEMs, retailers, politicians, and
the press in ways you only understand if you talk to them personally
which I have.
Hopefully, Lindows.com will contribute on each of these fronts, but it
will take more than one company. It's a shame that virtually every commercial
Linux company has abandoned the desktop. Here are some of the specific
things our 35 person company has accomplished in the 7 months we've been
around.
We've tried to bring some organizational skills to various initiatives
by being a good board member / organizer, helping plan conferences, working
on getting PR for several worthy efforts, etc. I've also spent time
lobbying congressmen, DOJ and talking to the non-settling states. This is
time-consuming, but critical to ensure that there's an environment where
companies can compete fairly.
We've joined KDE League at the highest corporate level.
We've agreed to sponsor the upcoming Debian Conference which people can
sign up for here: http://www.lindows.com/debconf2. Our sponsorship included
funds to pay for a dinner/awards banquet for all attendees (the first time
they will have such an event) as well as travel support for some attendees. I
don't know if the specific numbers have been finalized since the event
is not until this summer.
We hosted and sponsored Wineconf 2002. We worked with the project leader
to identify the top 25 contributors and paid for round-trip airfare flights
for all the key developers from as far away as South Africa and Norway to
San Diego. The venue and all meals were included. There was no registration
fee. We also sponsored LPBN.org to broadcast the event. CodeWeavers
graciously paid for dinner one night.
We've made a large investment in an open source company. We've also paid
about a million dollars to get code produced much of which has already
gone into various public GPL trees. We've paid these funds to companies as
well as individuals.
Our goal at Lindows.com is to build a company that will give consumers a
choice for their operating system. At the same time, we're committed to
being a good corporate citizen and being a supporter of open source for
the long run.
Linux Online:
Do you think that LindowsOS and other "second generation" distributions
that are now emerging are going to be more successful than the older
more established distributions in getting people to switch to Linux?
Michael Robertson:
Linux provides a reliable operating system, with a wide variety of
no-cost and low-cost software. However, Windows remains the operating
system on over 90% of the world's PCs. The main reason for this is that
the average computer user doesn't understand linux, and is quick to
dismiss it as software that is exclusively for people in Information
Technology, or computer pro's. LindowsOS provides the stability of
linux with the familiarity and feel of an average Windows machine (minus
the frequent crashes of an average Windows machine). With access to
your favorite Windows based software, plus a whole new world of linux
software, we believe that many people who were previously afraid of
making the switch (but are fed up with activation codes, and the high
cost of putting Windows on their home computers) will now be able to
experience the joys of Linux on a LindowsOS machine. When given the
option of a friendly install, and the ability to jump back and forth
between MS Windows and LindowsOS, using the same software and documents,
Linux will no longer seem as ominous as it once did to many computer
users.
Linux Online:
In a nutshell, if someone asks you: 'Why should I use LindowsOS?' What
would you say to him or her?
Michael Robertson:
If you enjoy paying between $200 and $300 for each copy of an
operating system that requires you buy separate copies for all of your
computers, if you like 30 digit activation codes, and an operating
system that tells you it will only start 29 more times before you
register your OS.then by all means there is no reason to upgrade to
LindowsOS. However, if you don't particularly enjoy those, and you
would like a more hassle free operating system, then you would want the
upgrade. LindowsOS opens the desktop to a world of low-cost and no-cost
software. Computer users will be able to install the OS with a few
clicks of the mouse and 15 minutes of spare time. Getting new software
will be as easy as a visit to the warehouse
http://www.lindows.com/warehouse and a single click of the mouse.
Linux Online:
Looking ahead, what role would you like to see Lindows.com playing in
the Linux community? In other words, what do you think is its mission in
terms of the Linux movement as a whole?
Michael Robertson:
Lindows.com and the Linux community work hand in hand and will
continue to do so. As a proud member and supporter of the KDE league,
we realize that our product would not even exist if it weren't for
Linux, and the brilliant minds in the Linux community. It is for that
reason that we have spent well over a million dollars in the last 6
months since our formation contributing to the Linux community -
wineconf 2002 www.lindows.com/wineconf (the Linux Public Broadcasting
Network came to broadcast the two-day event, and Mandrake provided
bandwidth for the video streams)
Lindows.com will continue to contribute time, money and
information to the Linux community and in turn, the Linux community will
continue to play a pivotal role in the development of LindowsOS.
Our thanks again to Michael Robertson for talking with us. You can
find out more information about LindowsOS at their website:
http://www.lindows.com
|