Huh? What's with this Google vs MS nonsense? It sounds like something out of Microshill. Seriously, Google needs to anticipate what MS can do as part of normal business operations, but otherwise Google's chief aim is to make money and they couldn't care less whether MS flourished or died.
Mr. Raikin seems to be living in a mushroom-induced world:
“The focus is on competitive self-interest; it’s on trying to undermine Microsoft, rather than what customers want to do,”
Did you spot the Bull words? What's "competitive self-interest"? Is the MS definition of "competition" 'looking after others' businesses'? Who hired this bozo? The claim to be undermining MS rather than providing what customers want is also laughable. Does MS provide what customers want? Who the hell asked for VisDuh? I say you can guess from the vapid ranting of Mr. Raikin why Google is doing well while MS is on the decline.
|