Seeing as how this is ESR, I'd have to give this a high possibility of being credible. Kind of leaves that article from a previous MS writer, scolding the media saying how well the MS anti-trust regulations have worked, with a little egg on his face.
I was wondering how SCO's kind of all out, self-destructive, burned bridges litigation could possibly be seen as a good thing for a company wanting to make money in a business market where they are litigating their own current customers. Well, seeing as they apparently just intend to shake down MS, why do they have need of customers?
Now let us see how Bush reacts to this tidbit and if the SEC will get its head out of the sand and investigates this. |