![[ Register ]](/images/navbar/register.gif)
![[ Applications ]](/images/navbar/applications.gif)
![[ Documentation ]](/images/navbar/documentation.gif)
![[ Distributions ]](/images/navbar/distributions.gif)
![[ Download Info ]](/images/navbar/download.gif)
![[ General Info ]](/images/navbar/geninfo.gif)
![[ Book Store ]](/images/navbar/bookstore.gif)
![[ Courses ]](/images/navbar/courses.gif)
![[ News ]](/images/navbar/news.gif)
![[ People ]](/images/navbar/people.gif)
![[ Hardware ]](/images/navbar/hardware.gif)
![[ Vendors ]](/images/navbar/vendors.gif)
![[ Projects ]](/images/navbar/projects.gif)
![[ Events ]](/images/navbar/events.gif)
![[ User Groups ]](/images/navbar/usergroups.gif)
![[ User Area ]](/images/navbar/user_area.gif)
![[ About Us ]](/images/navbar/aboutus.gif)
![[ Home Page ]](/images/navbar/homepage.gif)
![[ Advertise ]](/images/navbar/advertise.gif) |
| Who'd Be Responsible for a Linux Conficker? |
|---|
| | | |
| Publication: | OS News | Date: | Apr 15 2009 |
A Linux distribution is made up of various components written by lots of different projects. Those projects, in turn, are comprised of lots of individuals who contribute code in a loose manner. If you can blame "Microsoft" for the Conficker worm, then who do you blame when it comes to a Linux distribution?
|
 |
|
