![[ Register ]](/images/navbar/register.gif)
![[ Applications ]](/images/navbar/applications.gif)
![[ Documentation ]](/images/navbar/documentation.gif)
![[ Distributions ]](/images/navbar/distributions.gif)
![[ Download Info ]](/images/navbar/download.gif)
![[ General Info ]](/images/navbar/geninfo.gif)
![[ Book Store ]](/images/navbar/bookstore.gif)
![[ Courses ]](/images/navbar/courses.gif)
![[ News ]](/images/navbar/news.gif)
![[ People ]](/images/navbar/people.gif)
![[ Hardware ]](/images/navbar/hardware.gif)
![[ Vendors ]](/images/navbar/vendors.gif)
![[ Projects ]](/images/navbar/projects.gif)
![[ Events ]](/images/navbar/events.gif)
![[ User Groups ]](/images/navbar/usergroups.gif)
![[ User Area ]](/images/navbar/user_area.gif)
![[ About Us ]](/images/navbar/aboutus.gif)
![[ Home Page ]](/images/navbar/homepage.gif)
![[ Advertise ]](/images/navbar/advertise.gif) |
| SCO accuses IBM of colluding with Groklaw in new filing |
|---|
SCO's latest legal filing reveals the evidence on which the company bases its allegations that IBM is colluding with Groklaw blogger Pamela Jones, a claim she vigorously denies. The filing comes several months after Forbes reported that SCO was actively attempting to subpoena the Groklaw blogger. According to the filing, "the content and commentary of [Groklaw] (and other evidence) show that Ms. Jones is not an objective commentator, but rather a vehicle through which opponents of SCO have conducted their case against SCO in the court of public opinion, where no gate-keeper monitors the reliability of content."
|
 |
|
