![[ Register ]](/images/navbar/register.gif)
![[ Applications ]](/images/navbar/applications.gif)
![[ Documentation ]](/images/navbar/documentation.gif)
![[ Distributions ]](/images/navbar/distributions.gif)
![[ Download Info ]](/images/navbar/download.gif)
![[ General Info ]](/images/navbar/geninfo.gif)
![[ Book Store ]](/images/navbar/bookstore.gif)
![[ Courses ]](/images/navbar/courses.gif)
![[ News ]](/images/navbar/news.gif)
![[ People ]](/images/navbar/people.gif)
![[ Hardware ]](/images/navbar/hardware.gif)
![[ Vendors ]](/images/navbar/vendors.gif)
![[ Projects ]](/images/navbar/projects.gif)
![[ Events ]](/images/navbar/events.gif)
![[ User Groups ]](/images/navbar/usergroups.gif)
![[ User Area ]](/images/navbar/user_area.gif)
![[ About Us ]](/images/navbar/aboutus.gif)
![[ Home Page ]](/images/navbar/homepage.gif)
![[ Advertise ]](/images/navbar/advertise.gif) |
| SCO's case against IBM stands on shaky ground |
|---|
SCO's complaint consists of 136 averments — i.e., statements of fact — that form the basis of SCO's four main claims (called causes of action in the legal trade) against IBM. Every statement in a complaint is supposed to be truthful, and I think this is where SCO starts to run into trouble. If I were an advisor to IBM's legal team, I'd suggest looking closely at three suppositions that support almost all of SCO's arguments. Knocking any of the following would, I believe, all but destroy SCO's case.
|
 |
|
